Mendeley出力
＜紀要論文＞
コンピテンシーに基づく教育政策に関する分析枠組みの検討 : 世界文化理論とその発展を中心に
| その他のタイトル | |
|---|---|
| 作成者 | |
| 本文言語 | |
| 出版者 | |
| 発行日 | |
| 収録物名 | |
| 巻 | |
| 開始ページ | |
| 終了ページ | |
| 出版タイプ | |
| アクセス権 | |
| 関連DOI | |
| 関連URI | |
| 関連HDL | |
| 概要 | Internationalization of education seems to be inevitable in this ‘world society’ nowadays. Particularly since international organizations like UNESCO and OECD came to power, it seems like we can fin...d similar educational reforms or organizational structures all over the world, which is described by some scholars as ‘isomorphism’. Thus, it would be necessary to take global impact into account even when we are pursuing a policy study within a single state. Competency-based education (CBE) is an important strand in global governance within the education area. Thus, we need some alternative frameworks or perspectives that enable us to cover what is happening both globally and locally for a study focused on CBE policies in a certain state. In this article, we suggest that ‘world culture theory (WCT)’ as a theoretical basis for constructing a solid analytical framework of CBE policy studies, especially in Asia is necessary. This article argues that it is beneficial to borrow from WCT when trying to construct the framework for the CBE policy study, but we have to deal with its limitations first. It is clear that non-western actors and their original strategies are neglected in WCT, furthermore, it attaches too much importance to ‘global stories’, letting local realities merely untouched. However, this article suggests that we can developmentally adopt WCT. With a flexible application of the key concepts of ‘institutionalization’ and ‘legitimation’, this article finds out that WCT has the potential to create a framework covering the whole process of policy-making and implementation. An analytical framework for CBE Policy Research in Asia is presented based on the institutionalism logic rooted in WCT. This framework is characterized mainly by 2 points. (1) a consistent explanatory tool of ‘institutionalization and legitimation’ that is useful for picturing actors of multiple levels, including international organizations, nation-states, national organizations, local organizations, and individuals; (2) a comprehensive perspective that makes it possible to chase a dynamic process of policy-making and implementation in global/local nexus.続きを見る |
| 目次 | はじめに 1．国際的潮流としての CBE のアジア的展開 2．世界文化理論から見るグローバルガバナンスの中の教育政策の形成／普及過程 3．WCT をめぐる論争と発展可能性 4．CBE 政策分析における WCT の発展的な理論借用 おわりに |
詳細
| EISSN | |
|---|---|
| NCID | |
| レコードID | |
| 助成情報 | |
| 登録日 | 2024.02.01 |
| 更新日 | 2024.02.02 |